Discussion:
Corporate tax avoidance 'scheme' hurting Canada, expert says.
(too old to reply)
none
2014-03-15 17:17:29 UTC
Permalink
http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712

Corporate tax avoidance 'scheme' hurting Canada, expert says.

Country's corporate tax rate sits at about 25 per cent.

By Talin Vartanian, Mar 15, 2014

Dennis Howlett, executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, says
multinational corporations set up subsidiaries in tax havens such as
the Cayman Islands and devise ways to transfer profits there from
Canada.


As Canadians dutifully file personal income tax returns during the
coming weeks, consider this: many profitable companies pay little or no
tax.

In an interview this week on The Sunday Edition, Dennis Howlett,
executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, says these
multinational corporations set up subsidiaries in tax havens such as
Ireland, Switzerland and the Cayman Islands and devise ways to transfer
profits there from Canada. There are no laws to prevent this.


“There’s been a proliferation of tax havens,” Howlett explains to host
Michael Enright. “Now, a quarter of all direct Canadian foreign
investment going abroad is going to tax haven countries. That’s about
$170 billion sitting in tax havens, so it’s become a huge problem.”

Tax havens explained: How the rich hide money
How Canada’s banks help move money in and out of tax havens
An additional concern for Howlett’s organization is Canada’s low
corporate tax rate, which the Conservative government established with
no guarantee or requirement from corporations that they spend it on job
creation or other benefits to the country.

Currently, the rate is about 25 or 26 per cent, depending on the
province. It’s so low that Howlett has actually heard complaints from
the U.S.

“I was in Washington a year or so ago when I met with some of the
congressional staff there, who were complaining about Canada becoming a
tax haven,” he says, “because our corporate tax rates are now 10 points
below the U.S.”

Culture of 'secrecy'

He reveals that according to Bloomberg LP, few multinationals even pay
that low rate. Of the TSX 60 – the top 60 companies trading on the
Toronto Stock Exchange – only four paid 25 per cent tax or more between
2007 and 2011.

Thirteen per cent of these corporations paid less than 5 per cent in
taxes and more than half paid less than 10 per cent. Much of this tax
evasion is done secretly.


Tax Season Special Report: tips and tools
Corporate tax evasion 'crackdown' more bark than bite
Tax agency targeting middle-income tax cheats


“The secrecy allows people to open shell companies or trust accounts
where they don’t have to identify who the ultimate beneficial owner
is,” Howlett explains. “So an account can be opened up in the name of a
local lawyer or some other person who acts as an intermediary. That way
they can hide the fact that they’ve got money sitting in an account and
it’s very hard for the Canadian Revenue Agency to figure out who’s got
money hiding in Barbados or Cayman Islands or wherever it is.”

He adds that severe cuts at Revenue Canada – more than 3,000 public
servants, more than any other government department – have hampered the
government’s ability to investigate cases of corporate tax avoidance:
“The problem is unless there is some credible threat of being caught,
more and more people get into this tax-haven, tax-avoidance scheme.”

10 myths about taxes that mislead Canadians
He says the situation has become so serious that some corporations are
trying to “put the brakes on” tax cuts, as they witness the effects on
critical areas of the Canadian economy, such as education, health care
and infrastructure.

Global efforts are underway for reform. The G8 and G20 summits asked
the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to
devise a new international corporate tax system.

“Ultimately, I think we need a unitary taxation system where
multinational corporations have to report their global profits, and the
profits should be taxed where the economic activities occur and the
value is created,” Howlett says. “If the corporations aren’t paying
their fair share, ordinary taxpayers are shouldering more of the tax
responsibility.”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712
Greg Carr
2014-03-15 21:02:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by none
http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712
Corporate tax avoidance 'scheme' hurting Canada, expert says.
Country's corporate tax rate sits at about 25 per cent.
By Talin Vartanian, Mar 15, 2014
Dennis Howlett, executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, says
multinational corporations set up subsidiaries in tax havens such as
the Cayman Islands and devise ways to transfer profits there from
Canada.
As Canadians dutifully file personal income tax returns during the
coming weeks, consider this: many profitable companies pay little or no
tax.
In an interview this week on The Sunday Edition, Dennis Howlett,
executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, says these
multinational corporations set up subsidiaries in tax havens such as
Ireland, Switzerland and the Cayman Islands and devise ways to transfer
profits there from Canada. There are no laws to prevent this.
“There’s been a proliferation of tax havens,” Howlett explains to host
Michael Enright. “Now, a quarter of all direct Canadian foreign
investment going abroad is going to tax haven countries. That’s about
$170 billion sitting in tax havens, so it’s become a huge problem.”
Tax havens explained: How the rich hide money
How Canada’s banks help move money in and out of tax havens
An additional concern for Howlett’s organization is Canada’s low
corporate tax rate, which the Conservative government established with
no guarantee or requirement from corporations that they spend it on job
creation or other benefits to the country.
Currently, the rate is about 25 or 26 per cent, depending on the
province. It’s so low that Howlett has actually heard complaints from
the U.S.
“I was in Washington a year or so ago when I met with some of the
congressional staff there, who were complaining about Canada becoming a
tax haven,” he says, “because our corporate tax rates are now 10 points
below the U.S.”
Culture of 'secrecy'
He reveals that according to Bloomberg LP, few multinationals even pay
that low rate. Of the TSX 60 – the top 60 companies trading on the
Toronto Stock Exchange – only four paid 25 per cent tax or more between
2007 and 2011.
Thirteen per cent of these corporations paid less than 5 per cent in
taxes and more than half paid less than 10 per cent. Much of this tax
evasion is done secretly.
Tax Season Special Report: tips and tools
Corporate tax evasion 'crackdown' more bark than bite
Tax agency targeting middle-income tax cheats
“The secrecy allows people to open shell companies or trust accounts
where they don’t have to identify who the ultimate beneficial owner
is,” Howlett explains. “So an account can be opened up in the name of a
local lawyer or some other person who acts as an intermediary. That way
they can hide the fact that they’ve got money sitting in an account and
it’s very hard for the Canadian Revenue Agency to figure out who’s got
money hiding in Barbados or Cayman Islands or wherever it is.”
He adds that severe cuts at Revenue Canada – more than 3,000 public
servants, more than any other government department – have hampered the
“The problem is unless there is some credible threat of being caught,
more and more people get into this tax-haven, tax-avoidance scheme.”
10 myths about taxes that mislead Canadians
He says the situation has become so serious that some corporations are
trying to “put the brakes on” tax cuts, as they witness the effects on
critical areas of the Canadian economy, such as education, health care
and infrastructure.
Global efforts are underway for reform. The G8 and G20 summits asked
the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to
devise a new international corporate tax system.
“Ultimately, I think we need a unitary taxation system where
multinational corporations have to report their global profits, and the
profits should be taxed where the economic activities occur and the
value is created,” Howlett says. “If the corporations aren’t paying
their fair share, ordinary taxpayers are shouldering more of the tax
responsibility.”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712
Interesting.
--
*Read and obey the Bible*
~_~
2014-03-16 17:38:18 UTC
Permalink
Listen to the radio interview from CBC as you're doing other unimportant
stuff on your computer:

http://www.cbc.ca/thesundayedition/listen/

Click on 'Corporate tax avoidance' and enjoy. Especially if you're
preparing your personal tax returns.
____________________________________
Post by none
http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712
Corporate tax avoidance 'scheme' hurting Canada, expert says.
Country's corporate tax rate sits at about 25 per cent.
John
2014-03-18 23:17:56 UTC
Permalink
This we knew all along - we are getting screwed by harper and his cronies.
Bend over for the big shaft! I'd get flagged by all the computer surveilance
if I said what I really thought about harpers g*st*p*
Post by ~_~
Listen to the radio interview from CBC as you're doing other unimportant
http://www.cbc.ca/thesundayedition/listen/
Click on 'Corporate tax avoidance' and enjoy. Especially if you're
preparing your personal tax returns.
____________________________________
Post by none
http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712
Corporate tax avoidance 'scheme' hurting Canada, expert says.
Country's corporate tax rate sits at about 25 per cent.
{~_~} Раиса
2014-03-18 23:21:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by John
This we knew all along - we are getting screwed by harper and his cronies.
Bend over for the big shaft! I'd get flagged by all the computer surveilance
if I said what I really thought about harpers g*st*p*
Don't be afraid to speak up against Harper's regime. There's a whole
lot more of us than there is them.
And unless you're a foreigner under a working permit, you will still
have a vote in the next election.
Post by John
Post by ~_~
Listen to the radio interview from CBC as you're doing other unimportant
http://www.cbc.ca/thesundayedition/listen/
Click on 'Corporate tax avoidance' and enjoy. Especially if you're
preparing your personal tax returns.
____________________________________
Post by none
http://www.cbc.ca/news/corporate-tax-avoidance-scheme-hurting-canada-
expert-says-1.2572712
Corporate tax avoidance 'scheme' hurting Canada, expert says.
Country's corporate tax rate sits at about 25 per cent.
John
2014-03-19 21:22:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by John
This we knew all along - we are getting screwed by harper and his cronies.
Bend over for the big shaft! I'd get flagged by all the computer surveilance
if I said what I really thought about harpers g*st*p*
Don't be afraid to speak up against Harper's regime. There's a whole lot
more of us than there is them.
And unless you're a foreigner under a working permit, you will still have
a vote in the next election.
All I can say is that I didn't vote for him, and no one I know will admit to
voting for him it they did. I think Laherty knew that it is nearing the end
for Harper and he (Laherty) doesn't want to get caught up in the biggest
scandal in Canadian history - orders of magnitude bigger than this senate
kafuffle.
{~_~}
2014-03-19 21:35:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by John
Post by John
This we knew all along - we are getting screwed by harper and his cronies.
Bend over for the big shaft! I'd get flagged by all the computer surveilance
if I said what I really thought about harpers g*st*p*
Don't be afraid to speak up against Harper's regime. There's a whole lot
more of us than there is them.
And unless you're a foreigner under a working permit, you will still have
a vote in the next election.
All I can say is that I didn't vote for him, and no one I know will admit to
voting for him it they did. I think Laherty knew that it is nearing the end
for Harper and he (Laherty) doesn't want to get caught up in the biggest
scandal in Canadian history - orders of magnitude bigger than this senate
kafuffle.
I'm guessing something else happened that pushed Flaherty to quit:
He had decided that 'income splitting' was not a good thing to introduce
as part of the last Budget.
He had decided that it would be costing the Canadian economy over $5
Billion a year in lost revenue and he would have had a helluva time
bringing in a 'balanced budget' in time for the next federal election.

Harper saw it differently: He saw it as the breaking of a promise that
HE had made prior to achieving a majority government and he likely got a
whole lot of emails and pressure from the well-heeled who wanted a break
from taxes - just like the corporations.

Harper would have fought with Flaherty over this. Flaherty: concern for
economy and balanced budget. Harper: concern about flak over his broken
promise - and flak from the higher-income brackets. By muscling
Flaherty and effectively forcing him to quit, Harper can now get his
flunky Joe Oliver to reintroduce the 'income splitting' promise as
legislation -- damn the torpedos! If the Harper gang is NOT re-elected,
it would be a millstone for the incoming government to carry. $5
Billion a year is no joke as a loss. And especially when you consider
which layer of wage earners would be benefiting.

Watch for it: income-splitting from the idiot Joe Oliver.
John
2014-03-19 23:49:09 UTC
Permalink
We are doomed as Canadians - the wealthy barons and peon peasants is what
Harper wants - he is just a damned filthy stinkin rich lawyer anyway -
doesn't have a clue what real people live like here. I don't know anyone who
makes anywhere near as much annual income as the supposed "average" - that
is all a crock of shit and FUD spin, I don't beleive any of it at all,
nothing of any real meaning comes out his mouth - nor that of Christy Clark
either - she is as much of a snake as any other politician/lawyer/banker.
Christ warned us of that, He dealt with the same issue!
Post by {~_~}
Post by John
Post by John
This we knew all along - we are getting screwed by harper and his cronies.
Bend over for the big shaft! I'd get flagged by all the computer surveilance
if I said what I really thought about harpers g*st*p*
Don't be afraid to speak up against Harper's regime. There's a whole lot
more of us than there is them.
And unless you're a foreigner under a working permit, you will still have
a vote in the next election.
All I can say is that I didn't vote for him, and no one I know will admit to
voting for him it they did. I think Laherty knew that it is nearing the end
for Harper and he (Laherty) doesn't want to get caught up in the biggest
scandal in Canadian history - orders of magnitude bigger than this senate
kafuffle.
He had decided that 'income splitting' was not a good thing to introduce
as part of the last Budget.
He had decided that it would be costing the Canadian economy over $5
Billion a year in lost revenue and he would have had a helluva time
bringing in a 'balanced budget' in time for the next federal election.
Harper saw it differently: He saw it as the breaking of a promise that HE
had made prior to achieving a majority government and he likely got a
whole lot of emails and pressure from the well-heeled who wanted a break
from taxes - just like the corporations.
Harper would have fought with Flaherty over this. Flaherty: concern for
economy and balanced budget. Harper: concern about flak over his broken
promise - and flak from the higher-income brackets. By muscling Flaherty
and effectively forcing him to quit, Harper can now get his flunky Joe
Oliver to reintroduce the 'income splitting' promise as legislation --
damn the torpedos! If the Harper gang is NOT re-elected, it would be a
millstone for the incoming government to carry. $5 Billion a year is no
joke as a loss. And especially when you consider which layer of wage
earners would be benefiting.
Watch for it: income-splitting from the idiot Joe Oliver.
{~_~}
2014-03-19 23:56:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by John
We are doomed as Canadians - the wealthy barons and peon peasants is what
Harper wants - he is just a damned filthy stinkin rich lawyer anyway -
doesn't have a clue what real people live like here. I don't know anyone who
makes anywhere near as much annual income as the supposed "average" - that
is all a crock of shit and FUD spin, I don't beleive any of it at all,
nothing of any real meaning comes out his mouth - nor that of Christy Clark
either - she is as much of a snake as any other politician/lawyer/banker.
Christ warned us of that, He dealt with the same issue!
Just one correction . . . Harper DOESN'T have a law degree. He just
acts like an arrogant, bully lawyer.
Post by John
Post by {~_~}
Post by John
All I can say is that I didn't vote for him, and no one I know will admit to
voting for him it they did. I think Laherty knew that it is nearing the end
for Harper and he (Laherty) doesn't want to get caught up in the biggest
scandal in Canadian history - orders of magnitude bigger than this senate
kafuffle.
He had decided that 'income splitting' was not a good thing to introduce
as part of the last Budget.
He had decided that it would be costing the Canadian economy over $5
Billion a year in lost revenue and he would have had a helluva time
bringing in a 'balanced budget' in time for the next federal election.
Harper saw it differently: He saw it as the breaking of a promise that HE
had made prior to achieving a majority government and he likely got a
whole lot of emails and pressure from the well-heeled who wanted a break
from taxes - just like the corporations.
Harper would have fought with Flaherty over this. Flaherty: concern for
economy and balanced budget. Harper: concern about flak over his broken
promise - and flak from the higher-income brackets. By muscling Flaherty
and effectively forcing him to quit, Harper can now get his flunky Joe
Oliver to reintroduce the 'income splitting' promise as legislation --
damn the torpedos! If the Harper gang is NOT re-elected, it would be a
millstone for the incoming government to carry. $5 Billion a year is no
joke as a loss. And especially when you consider which layer of wage
earners would be benefiting.
Watch for it: income-splitting from the idiot Joe Oliver.
John
2014-03-20 23:39:26 UTC
Permalink
Pardon me!! I didn't realize he was only faking it - makes it even worse!!
Post by John
We are doomed as Canadians - the wealthy barons and peon peasants is what
Harper wants - he is just a damned filthy stinkin rich lawyer anyway -
doesn't have a clue what real people live like here. I don't know anyone who
makes anywhere near as much annual income as the supposed "average" - that
is all a crock of shit and FUD spin, I don't beleive any of it at all,
nothing of any real meaning comes out his mouth - nor that of Christy Clark
either - she is as much of a snake as any other politician/lawyer/banker.
Christ warned us of that, He dealt with the same issue!
Just one correction . . . Harper DOESN'T have a law degree. He just acts
like an arrogant, bully lawyer.
Post by John
Post by {~_~}
Post by John
All I can say is that I didn't vote for him, and no one I know will
admit
to
voting for him it they did. I think Laherty knew that it is nearing the end
for Harper and he (Laherty) doesn't want to get caught up in the biggest
scandal in Canadian history - orders of magnitude bigger than this senate
kafuffle.
He had decided that 'income splitting' was not a good thing to introduce
as part of the last Budget.
He had decided that it would be costing the Canadian economy over $5
Billion a year in lost revenue and he would have had a helluva time
bringing in a 'balanced budget' in time for the next federal election.
Harper saw it differently: He saw it as the breaking of a promise that HE
had made prior to achieving a majority government and he likely got a
whole lot of emails and pressure from the well-heeled who wanted a break
from taxes - just like the corporations.
Harper would have fought with Flaherty over this. Flaherty: concern for
economy and balanced budget. Harper: concern about flak over his broken
promise - and flak from the higher-income brackets. By muscling Flaherty
and effectively forcing him to quit, Harper can now get his flunky Joe
Oliver to reintroduce the 'income splitting' promise as legislation --
damn the torpedos! If the Harper gang is NOT re-elected, it would be a
millstone for the incoming government to carry. $5 Billion a year is no
joke as a loss. And especially when you consider which layer of wage
earners would be benefiting.
Watch for it: income-splitting from the idiot Joe Oliver.
Loading...